PREVALENCE, RISK FACTORS AND CLINICAL PRESENTATIONS OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS AMONG GROUP OF PREGNANT WOMEN IN LABOR WORD AT MATERNITY TEACHING HOSPITAL IN SULAIMANI CITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17656/jsmc.10157Keywords:
Clinical features, Risk factors, Bacterial Vaginosis, PregnancyAbstract
Background
Bacterial vaginosis is a major cause of vaginitis during pregnancy and it results in complications like preterm labor and low birth weight. This may be as a result from excessive growth of anaerobic bacteria in the vagina where it either replaces or reduces normal vaginal flora.
Objectives
To detect prevalence, risk factors and clinical presentation of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women in Sulaimani Maternity Teaching Hospital
Patients and Methods
A cross sectional, quantitative-non experimental descriptive design. Sampling technique used was non-probability convenient sampling. The data collection was carried out from 16th December 2016 to 16th April 2017. One hundred women were selected from labor ward and a high vaginal swab was used to obtain discharge from the vagina, then transfer it immediately to Pharma Gen laboratory. Bacterial vaginosis were confirmed by Nugent criteria.
Results
Prevalence of Bacterial vaginosis was 25%, it was more in the age group of more than 35 years. Most of them were secondary school graduates, housewives, barely sufficient in their economic status, living in urban and were female with 2-4 gravidity. No relation was found between abortion, and early neonatal death with bacterial vaginosis. Excessive vaginal discharge, pruritus, dysuria, white discharge, and fishy odor are common symptoms. Steroids, antibiotics and diabetes mellitus found to be risk factors.
Conclusion
One quarter of studied women were affected by bacterial vaginosis, common among multigravida and older age. Clinical feature of purities, excessive vaginal discharge, and fishy odor are highly characteristics of this infection. Diabetic women, prolong use of antibiotic or steroid found to be risk factors.
References
Workowski K, Berman S. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR 2010; 59:1-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir694
Menard JP, Mazouni C, Fenollar F, Raoult D, Boubli L, Bretelle F. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitativereal-time PCR assay versus clinical and Gram stain identification of bacterial vaginosis. Eur J ClinMicrobiol Infect Dis. 2010; 29: 1547–1552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1039-3
Trabert B, Misra DP. Risk factors for bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy among African American women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 477.e1–477.e8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.085
Cammack AL, Buss C, Entringer S, Hogue CJ, Hobel CJ, Wadhwa PD. The association between early life adversity and bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204: 431.e1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.01.054
Myer, L, Denny, L, Telerant, R. Bacterial vaginosis and susceptibility to HIV infection in South African women: a nested case-control study. Infectious Disease 2005; 192:1372–1380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/462427
Abahilasha Gupta, Priyanka Garg, Shipra Nigam. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy and its effect on pregnancy outcome: a study from a Waster city. Indian Journal of Clinical practice. 2013; 23(11):740-744.
Turovskiy, Y., Sutyak Noll, K., Chikindas, M. L. The aetiology of bacterial vaginosis. Journal of applied microbiology 2011; 110(5): 1105-1128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.04977.x
Zhou X, Bent S, Schneider M , Davis C, Islam, R & Forney J. Characterization of vaginal microbial communities in adult healthy women using cultivation-independent methods. Microbiology. 2004; 150: 2565–2573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.26905-0
Livengood, C. H. Bacterial vaginosis: an overview for 2009. Reviews in obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009; 2(1): 28.
Marrazzo, J.M. Interpreting the epidemiology and natural history of Bacterial vaginosis: Are we still confused? Anaerobe. 2011;17(4): 186-190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.03.016
Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29: 297–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.29.2.297-301.1991
Spiegel CA, Amsel R, Holmes KK. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by direct Gram stain of vaginal fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 198;18:170–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.18.1.170-177.1983
Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, Chen KC, Eschenbach D, Holmes K. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 1983;74:14–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(83)91112-9
Nelson, D.B and Macones, G. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: Current findings and future directions., Epidemiology Reviews.2002;24: 102-108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxf008
Gyasi Konadu, Dennis. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis, trichomoniasis and vulvo vaginal candidiasis in pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at the kintampo municipal hospital. Kintampo. MSc thesis In the Department of Clinical Microbiology, School of Medical Science College of Health Science Kwame Nkrumah University Of Science And Technology, Kumasi. 2015; p46-52
Ajani, G., Oduyebo, O., Haruna, M., &Elikwu, C. Nugent Scores of Pregnant Women in a Tertiary Institution in Nigeria. Advances in Microbiology 2012; 2:531-536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2012.24068
Kirakoya-Samadoulougou, F., Nagot, N., Defer, M.-C., Yaro, S., Fao, P., Ilboudo, F., et al. Epidemiology of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in rural and urban Burkina Faso. Sexually transmitted diseases 2011:38(2); 117-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181f0bef7
Zemenu M, Yimtubezinash W, Daniel A, Addis A. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Tikur Anbessa University Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Research Notes 2014; 7:822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-822
Ibrahim SM, Bukar M, Galadima GB, Audu BM, Ibrahim HA. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women in Maiduguri, North-Eastern Nigeria. .Niger J ClinPract. 2014;17:154-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.127424
Bahram A, Hamid B, Zohre T. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and impact of genital hygiene practices in non-pregnant women in Zanjan, Iran. Oman Medical Journal. 2009;24(4): 288–293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2009.58
Fang X, Zhou Y, Yang Y, Diao Y, H. Lie H. Prevalence and risk factors of trichomoniasis, bacterial vaginosis, and candidiasis for married women of child-bearing age in rural Shandong. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2007; 60(5): 257–261
Babul C , Arnab K K, Dhrubajyati S, Suman K D, Apurba. Different Type of Vaginal Infection in Pregnancy and Its Risk Factor – A Study in Urban Medical College Hospital of India Sch. J. App. Med. Sci, 2013; 1(6):962-966.
Indu L, Yashodhara P, Sujata S, Amita J. Estimation of the Incidence of Bacterial Vaginosis and other Vaginal Infections and its Consequences on Maternal/Fetal Outcome in Pregnant Women Attending an Antenatal Clinic in a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine. 2010; 35( 2):286-287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.66855
Prosper A, kihunrwa A, Mirambo M , Massinde A, Rumanyika R, Ngwalida N and et al. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and associated factors among pregnant women attending at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania. 2012;14(3):175-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v14i3.3
Victor D, Habib M, Abdullahi R, Bamgboye M. Bacterial Vaginosis is a Common Vaginal Infection among First-Time Antenatal Clinic Attendees: Evidence from a Tertiary Health Facility in North-West Nigeria. Journal of Prevention& Infection Control 2016;2 (2):1-9
Briery CM, Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Cushman JL, Morrison JC. Treatment of bacterial vaginosis does not reduce preterm birth among high-risk asymptomatic women in fetal fibronectin positive patients. J. Miss. State Med Assoc 2011; 52:72–75.
Kuruga Martha. Bacterial vaginosis: prevalence and value of different diagnostic tests among prenatal women at kenyatta national hospital. MSc Thesis of Medicine in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nairobi in Kenyatta. 2012:1-63
Romoren M, Velauthapillai M, Rahman M, Sundby J, Klouman E, Hjortdahl P. Trichomoniasis and bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: Inadequately managed with the syndromic approach. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:297‑304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.06.031922
Olugbenga A O, Olufunmilola B M, Rita O, Daniel A. A. Prevalence of vulvo vaginal candidiasis, trichomoniasis and bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women receiving antenatal care in southwestern Nigeria. Eur J Microbiol Immunol. 2014; (4): 193–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/EUJMI-D-14-00027
Prasanna D, Sita J, Chham M P, Laxman M. Assessment of Risk Factors and Medication Use for Infectious Vaginitis Among Females of Reproductive Age Visiting Maternity Hospital of Pokhara, Nepal. Public Health Journal. 2017;(10): 140-147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874944501710010140
Mascarenhas R, Machado M, Costa e S, Pimentel R, Ferreira T, Leoni F, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for bacterial vaginosis and other vulvo vaginitis in a population of sexually active adolescents from Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2012,Article ID378640:1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/378640
Thulkar J, Kriplani A, Agarwal N, Vishnubhatla S. Aetiology and risk factors of recurrent vaginitis and its association with various contraceptive methods. Indian J Med Res. 2010; 131: 83-7.
Tempera G. Vaginal infections: Epidemiology and risk factors. Luglio-Agosto Giorn. It Ost Gin. 2005; 27: 7-8.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Gona Othman Faris and Sallama Kamel Nasir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under 