CESAREAN SCAR ECTOPIC PREGNANCY IN RELATION TO PREVIOUS OBSTETRICAL HISTORY

Authors

  • Gash Khalid Arif Maternity Teaching Hospital, Directorate of Health of Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
  • Chro Najmaddin Fattah College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17656/jsmc.10400

Keywords:

Cesarean section, Ectopic pregnancy, Scar ectopic

Abstract

Background 

Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) is the implantation of a gestational sac inside the scar of a previous cesarean section (C/S). CSEP is a life-threatening condition that needs early management.

Objectives 

The study aimed to know the associations between CSEP and previous obstetrical history.

Patients and Methods

Twenty-seven women with CSEP who were admitted to the Sulaimani Maternity Teaching Hospital from September 2019 to October 2021 were collected for this cross-sectional study. Complete obstetrical history, clinical features, the interval between the last C/S and CSEP, mode of diagnosis, and types of management were recorded.

Results

The mean of maternal age, gravidity and parity were 32.14±4.63 years (range, 24 to 40 years), 3.73±1.75 (range, 1 to 8) and 2.36±1.33 (range, 1 to 6), respectively. The majority (74.1%) had no significant medical diseases. The mean interval between the last C/S and CSEP was 2.6±1.8 years, and 92.6% complained of vaginal bleeding. The association of gravidity with CSEP presentation was statistically significant. Only 22.2% had a history of one prior C/S alone; however, 74.1, 14.8%, and 3.7% of patients had two, three, and four previous C/Ss, respectively. Besides, the associations of first and second C/Ss with obstetricians’ experience who performed the C/Ss were statistically significant. 

Conclusion

The risk of CSEP increases when the frequency of gravidity and previous C/S increases.

References

Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy not within the (distal) fallopian tube: Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Obs Gynecol. 2012;206(4):289–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.10.857

Marion LL, Meeks GR. Ectopic pregnancy: History, incidence, epidemiology, and risk factors. Clin Obs Gynecol. 2012;55(2):376–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182516d7b

Alkatout I, Honemeyer U, Strauss A, Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Jonat W, et al. Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy Ibrahim. Obs Gynecol Surv. 2013;68(8):571–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0b013e31829cdbeb

Mohapatra I, Samantray SR. Scar Ectopic Pregnancy - An Emerging Challenge. Cureus. 2021;13(7):e16673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16673

Jameel K, Abdul Mannan G, Niaz R, Hayat D. Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Diagnostic and Management Challenge. Cureus. 2021;13(4):e14463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14463

Shi M, Zhang H, Qi S, Liu W, Liu M, Zhao X, et al. They are identifying risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective study of 79 cases. Ginekol Pol. 2018;89(4):196–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2018.0033

Wang Q, Peng HL, He L, Zhao X. Reproductive outcomes after previous cesarean scar pregnancy: Follow up of 189 women. Taiwan J Obs Gynecol. 2015;54(5):551–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2015.08.006

Lincenberg KR, Behrman ER, Bembry JS, Kovac CM. Uterine Rupture with Cesarean Scar Heterotopic Pregnancy with Survival of the Intrauterine Twin. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2016;2016:Article ID 6832094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6832094

Zhou XY, Li H, Fu XD. Identifying possible risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy based on a retrospective study of 291 cases. J Obs Gynaecol Res. 2020;46(2):272–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14163

Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Obs Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1373–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000218690.24494.ce

Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obs Gynecol. 2003;21(3):220–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.56

Seow K, Hwang J, Tsai Y. Ultrasound diagnosis of a pregnancy in a Cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obs Gynecol. 2001;18(5):547–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00569.x

Timor-Tritsch I, Monteagudo A, Cali G, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Maymon R, Arslan A, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology. Ultrasound Obs Gynecol. 2014;43:383–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13282

Shamshirsaz AA, Fox KA, Erfani H, Clark SL, Salmanian B, Baker BWet al. Multidisciplinary team learning in managing the morbidly adherent placenta: outcome improvements over time. Am J Obs Gynecol. 2017;216(6):612.e1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.016

Nagi J, Ofili-Yebovi D, Sawyer E, Aplin J, Jurkovic D. Successful treatment of a recurrent Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy by surgical repair of the uterine defect. Ultrasound Obs Gynecol. 2006;28:855–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.3843

Lee JH, Kwon DH, Ahn KH, Hong SC, Kim T. Concomitant ultrasound-guided intra-gestational sac methotrexate-potassium chloride and systemic methotrexate injection in the recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy. Obs Gynecol Sci. 2016;59(3):245–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2016.59.3.245

Published

2023-03-21

How to Cite

1.
Arif G, Fattah C. CESAREAN SCAR ECTOPIC PREGNANCY IN RELATION TO PREVIOUS OBSTETRICAL HISTORY. JSMC [Internet]. 2023 Mar. 21 [cited 2024 May 28];13(1):83-8. Available from: https://jsmc.univsul.edu.iq/index.php/jsmc/article/view/jsmc-10400

Similar Articles

1-10 of 57

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)