ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF BACTERIA ASSOCIATED WITH MOBILE PHONES IN SULAIMANI CITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17656/jsmc.10084Keywords:
Mobile phones surface bacteria, Contamination of mobile phones, Sulaimani cityAbstract
Background
Mobile phones are one of common inanimate objects that come in contact with human hands and hence host several types of bacteria.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to identify the types of bacteria present on the surfaces of mobile phones in a sample of people from Sulaimani city.
Materials and Methods
This is a cross sectional study on bacterial isolation from mobile phones surfaces. After collecting data concerning the phones and their users, swab samples were obtained from phone surfaces and immediately streaked on bacteriological media. Isolated microorganisms were identified based on culture and colony characteristics, biochemical activity and Vitek® 2 identification system.
Results
Out of 400 mobile phone samples, 272 (68%) swabs showed growth of one or more microorganisms. A total of 322 microorganisms were identified, the most common isolated bacteria was Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) species followed by Bacillus and Micrococcus species. Few pathogenic bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogens, Staphylococcus aureus and enteric microorganisms were also isolated.
Conclusion
Mobile phones are one of the frequently used gadgets that are contaminated by many types of bacteria from human contact. The types of the bacteria on their surface reflect those on human hand which can vary according to the hand hygiene.
References
The International Telecommunication Union. ITC Facts and Figures. Switzerland 2013. Available from: http ://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2013-e.pdf
Osterholm MT, Hedberg CW. Epidemiologic Principles. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. 7 ed. Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. p. 179-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-06839-3.00013-8
Tagoe DN, Gyande VK, Ansah EO. Bacterial Contamination of Mobile Phones: When Your Mobile Phone Could Transmit More Than Just a Call. WebmedCentral Microbiology 2011;2(10).
Akinyemi KO, Atapu AD, Adetona OO, Coker AO. The potential role of mobile phones in the spread of bacterial infections. Journal of infection in developing countries. 2009;3(8):628-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.556
Ulger F, Esen S, Dilek A, Yanik K, Gunaydin M, Leblebicioglu H. Are we aware how contaminated our mobile phones with nosocomial pathogens? Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials. 2009;8:7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-8-7
Datta P, Rani H, Chander J, Gupta V. Bacterial contamination of mobile phones of health care workers. Indian journal of medical microbiology. 2009;27(3):279-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.53222
Morioka I, Tabuchi Y, Takahashi Y, Oda Y, Nakai M, Yanase A, et al. [Bacterial contamination of mobile phones shared in hospital wards and the consciousness and behavior of nurses about biological cleanliness]. Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene. 2011;66(1):115-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1265/jjh.66.115
Song S. Study: 1 in 6 Cell Phones Contaminated With Fecal Matter. TIME. 2011 17/10/2011. Avialble from http://healthland.time.com/2011/10/17/study-1-in-6-cell-phones-contaminated-with-fecal-matter/print/.
Foxnew.com. Mobile Phones 18 Times Dirtier Than Toilet Handles 2010 [16/10/2014]. Available from: http://www.foxnews.com/story/2010/07/30/mobile-phones-18-times-dirtier-than-toilet-handles/.
Colaninno PM. Identification of Gram-Positive Organisms. In: Goldman E, H. GL, editors. Practical Handbook of Microbiology. Second ed. Boca Raton CRC Press; 2009. p. 53-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420009330.ch5
Kohlerschmidt Dj, Musser KA, Dumas NB. Identification of Aerobic Gram-Negative Bacteria. In: Goldman E, H. GL, editors. Practical Handbook of Microbiology. Second ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009. p. 67-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420009330.ch6
SPSS for Windows. version 19. Chicago: SPSS Inc.; 2010.
Pittet D. Improving compliance with hand hygiene in hospitals. Infection control and hospital epidemiology : the official journal of the Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America. 2000;21(6):381-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/501777
Lederer JW, Jr., Best D, Hendrix V. A comprehensive hand hygiene approach to reducing MRSA health care-associated infections. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35(4):180-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1553-7250(09)35024-2
Boyce JM, Pittet D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. CDC, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/503164
Bauma RW. Infection, Infectious Diseases, and Epidemiology. In: Bauma RW, editor. Microbiology With Diseases by Body System. Boston Perason; 2015. p. 415-47.
Davis DL, Miller AB, Philips A. Association of mobile phone use with adult brain cancer remains plausible. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2012;344:e3083; author reply e8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e3083
Yamaguchi N. [The IARC carcinogenicity evaluation of radio-frequency electromagnetic field: with special reference to epidemiology of mobile phone use and brain tumor risk]. Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene. 2013;68(2):78-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1265/jjh.68.78
de Vocht F, Burstyn I, Cherrie JW. Time trends (1998-2007) in brain cancer incidence rates in relation to mobile phone use in England. Bioelectromagnetics. 2011;32(5):334-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20648
Jeske HC, Tiefenthaler W, Hohlrieder M, Hinterberger G, Benzer A. Bacterial contamination of anaesthetists’ hands by personal mobile phone and fixed phone use in the operating theatre. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(9):904-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05172.x
Brady RR, Wasson A, Stirling I, McAllister C, Damani NN. Is your phone bugged? The incidence of bacteria known to cause nosocomial infection on healthcare workers’ mobile phones. The Journal of hospital infection. 2006;62(1):123-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2005.05.005
Brady RR, Hunt AC, Visvanathan A, Rodrigues MA, Graham C, Rae C, et al. Mobile phone technology and hospitalized patients: a cross-sectional surveillance study of bacterial colonization, and patient opinions and behaviours. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2011;17(6):830-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03493.x
Ustun C, Cihangiroglu M. Health care workers’ mobile phones: a potential cause of microbial cross-contamination between hospitals and community. Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene. 2012;9(9):538-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2012.697419
Sadat-Ali M, Al-Omran AK, Azam Q, Bukari H, Al-Zahrani AJ, Al-Turki RA, et al. Bacterial flora on cell phones of health care providers in a teaching institution. American journal of infection control. 2010;38(5):404-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2009.08.007
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Bayan Taha Majid , Narmeen Nasra AL-Deen Fathi, Sherko A Omer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under 