Peer-Review policy

The Journal of Sulaimani Medical College (JSMC) follows a rigorous double-blind peer-review process to ensure the scientific integrity, quality, and relevance of published manuscripts.

1. Review Model

• Double-blind: Identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed to ensure objectivity.

2. Review Process

• All submissions undergo an initial editorial screening for scope, formatting, and scientific quality.
• Manuscripts that pass this stage are sent to at least two independent expert reviewers in the relevant field.
• Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on:
• Originality and contribution to the field
• Study design and methodology
• Statistical validity
• Ethical compliance (including IRB approval and informed consent)
• Relevance to JSMC’s scope
• Clarity and coherence of writing

3. Review Timeline

• Authors typically receive the first decision within 4 to 6 weeks of submission.
• Revised manuscripts may undergo a second round of review before a final editorial decision.

4. Reviewer Responsibilities

• Maintain strict confidentiality throughout and after the review process.
• Provide constructive, unbiased, and timely feedback.
• Declare any conflicts of interest or inability to review objectively.
• Refrain from using any part of the manuscript for personal advantage.

5. Editorial Decision

• Final decisions (accept, minor revision, major revision, or rejection) are made by the editorial board based on reviewers’ recommendations and the manuscript’s overall merit.

6. Appeals and Rebuttals

• Authors who wish to appeal a rejection must submit a formal, evidence-based rebuttal explaining why the editorial decision should be reconsidered.
• Appeals will be reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief and/or an independent member of the editorial board.

7. Reviewer Recognition

• Reviewers may be acknowledged annually on the journal website (unless they opt out) to promote transparency and academic contribution.