AN INTRAOPERATIVE SCORING SYSTEM DURING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IS A VALUABLE TOOL TO ASSESS CONVERSION RATES AND PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS

Authors

  • Mezjda Ismail Rashaan Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17656/jsmc.10296

Keywords:

Intraoperative Scoring, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Valuable Tool Perioperative Complications, Conversion Rates

Abstract

Background 

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is currently the gold standard procedure for management of gall bladder diseases (GBD). Bile duct injuries are the most disaster complication during this procedure, especially in patients with acute cholecystitis. To decrease such biliary injuries intraoperatively and conversion rates, it is necessary to have preoperative and intraoperative assessment of gall bladder according to special grading scale. In this study for such evaluation and assessment in patients with acute cholecystitis we are using Parkland Grading Scale (PGS).

Objectives 

To evaluate pre-operative findings, conversion rates, and perioperative complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy through intra-operative assessment of the gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Materials and Methods

A cohort of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were retrospectively studied. The Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis (PGS), which consists of a five-tier grading system, was used for the intra-operative assessment of the gallbladder

Results

710 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this study. High pre-operative white blood cell counts, as well as bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase levels and ultrasonography features such as gallbladder thickness, bile duct dilatation, and stones in the common bile duct, were significantly more often present in patients with grades 3, 4, and 5 than in patients with grades 1 and 2 (p<0.0001). Patients with grades 4 and 5 had the highest conversion rate compared with patients with other grades (50.0% and 66.7%, respectively, p<0.0001). Furthermore, the number of perioperative complications was highest with grades 4 and 5 compared with other grades (40.0% and 33.3%, respectively, p<0.0001). The incidence of bile duct injuries, seroma, and wound infections were highest with grade 4 compared with other grades (5%, 10%, and 20%, respectively, p<0.0001) 

Conclusion

Intra-operative assessment of the severity of gallbladder disease using the Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis (PGS) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a valuable tool to assess the difficultly of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the conversion rates, and perioperative complications.

References

Shaffer EA. Gallstone disease: Epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006;20(6):981- 96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2006.05.004

Stinton LM, Shaffer EA. Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver 2012;6(2):172-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2012.6.2.172

Pucher PH, Brunt LM, Davies N, Linsk A, Munshi A, Rodriguez HA, et al. Outcome trends and safety measures after 30 years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and pooled data analysis. Surg Endosc 2018;32(5):2175-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5974-2

Papanicolas I, Woskie LR, Jha AK. Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries. JAMA 2018;319(10):1024-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.1150

Nidoni R, Udachan TV, Sasnur P, Baloorkar R, Sindgikar V, Narasangi B. Predicting Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Based on Clinicoradiological Assessment. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9(12): PC09-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/15593.6929

Ashfaq A, Ahmadieh K, Shah AA, Chapital AB, Harold KL, Johnson DJ. The difficult gall bladder: Outcomes following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the need for open conversion. Am J Surg 2016;212(6):1261-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.024

Madni TD, Leshikar DE, Minshall CT, Nakonezny PA, Cornelius CC, Imran JB, et al. The Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis. Am J Surg 2018;215(4):625-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.017

Madni TD, Nakonezny PA, Barrios E, Imran JB, Clark AT, Taveras L, et al. Prospective validation of the Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis. Am J Surg 2019;217(1):90-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.08.005

Annane D, Pastores SM, Rochwerg B, Arlt W, Balk RA, Beishuizen A, et al. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Critical Illness-Related Corticosteroid Insufficiency (CIRCI) in Critically Ill Patients (Part I): Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) 2017. Crit Care Med 2017;45(12):2078-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002737

Yang TF, Guo L, Wang Q. Evaluation of Preoperative Risk Factor for Converting Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy: A Meta-Analysis. Hepato-gastroenterology 2014;61(132):958-65.

Hayama S, Ohtaka K, Shoji Y, Ichimura T, Fujita M, Senmaru N, et al. Risk Factors for Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2016;20(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2016.00065

Tarcoveanu E, Niculescu D, Georgescu S, Epure O, Bradea C. [Conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy]. Chirurgia(Bucur) 2005;100(5):437-44.

Lee W, Jang JY, Cho JK, Hong SC, Jeong CY. Does surgical difficulty relate to severity of acute cholecystitis? Validation of the parkland grading scale based on intraoperative findings. Am J Surg 2018.

Lim KR, Ibrahim S, Tan NC, Lim SH, Tay KH. Risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2007;36(8):631-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V36N8p631

Livingston EH, Rege RV. A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2004;188(3):205-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.013

Palade R, Vasile D, Grigoriu M, Roman H, Caplan I. [Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy]. Chirurgia (Bucur) 1997;92(2):87-92.

La Regina D, Mongelli F, Cafarotti S, Saporito A, Ceppi M, Di Giuseppe M, et al. Use of retrieval bag in the prevention of wound infection in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it evidence-based? A meta-analysis. BMC Surg 2018;18(1):102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-018-0442-z

Bunting DM. Port-site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 2010;14(4):490-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12924466007728

Coda A, Bossotti M, Ferri F, Mattio R, Ramellini G, Poma A, et al. Incisional hernia and fascial defect following laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2000;10(1):34-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00129689-200002000-00008

Published

2021-06-21

How to Cite

1.
Rashaan M. AN INTRAOPERATIVE SCORING SYSTEM DURING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IS A VALUABLE TOOL TO ASSESS CONVERSION RATES AND PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS. JSMC [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 21 [cited 2024 Jun. 13];11(2):139-47. Available from: https://jsmc.univsul.edu.iq/index.php/jsmc/article/view/jsmc-10296

Similar Articles

1-10 of 130

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.