Issues‎ > ‎Vol7n3‎ > ‎

jsmc-10131


THE INCIDENCE AND ASSOCIATED RISK FACTORS AFFECTING THE RATE OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY IN PRIME AND MULTIGRAVIDA WOMEN IN SULAIMANI MATERNITY TEACHING HOSPITAL


Chro Fattah a, Huda Moheeddin b and Fattah Hawrammi c 


a Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani. 
b Maternity Teaching Hospital, Sulaimani.
c Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani. 
 

Submitted: 15/2/2017; Accepted: 15/10/2017; Published: 1/11/2017

DOI Link: 

ABSTRACT

Background 

Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is a potentially life-threatening condition and still the major cause of maternal mortality in the first trimester of pregnancy. It accounts for approximately 10% of maternal deaths. Despite major advances, early diagnosis of EP is still a challenge for clinicians. In the past 20 years, the use of sensitive βhCG tests, high-resolution transvaginal ultrasound, and advances in laparoscopy (LS) have enabled the detection of EP without tubal rupture. 

Objectives 

The aim of the study is to determine the incidence and associated risk factors for ectopic pregnancy, and to address these risk factors in prime gravid and multigravida. 

Patients and Methods

This study was conducted in the period from January the 1st 2015 to the July 1st 2015, all ectopic pregnancy patients admitted to Sulaimani Maternity Hospital were collected. Data from 100 patients recorded, however we didn’t have all variables from 7 patients, we analyzed 93 of the cases. Written consent for the study was obtained from all the patients.

Results

Our results show weight and BMI were demographic changes that most significantly affect the results. The higher the weight the higher the risk of ectopic pregnancy. Only (11.8%) has no risk factors, most of patient had multiple risk factors (63.4%) were among multiparas women and (24.7%) had only one risk factors. 

Conclusion 

We found the main demographic variable was High body weight and BMI. Most of the patient have multiple risk factors and risks higher  in multigravida women than prime gravid. The most significant risk factor for increasing the rate was confirmed with previous ectopic pregnancy, combined contraception pills. Pathological vaginal discharge, and previous caesarean section. We found this increase may be due to poor in c/s technique and increase in the rate of caesarean section on request especially in private sector. This study is was unique in the area to address these risk factors for ectopic pregnancy.

KEYWORDS

Ectopic pregnancy, Risk factors, Previous ectopic pregnancy, Vaginal discharge.

References 
    1. Schmidt T., Rein D. T., Foth D., Eibach H.-W., Kurbacher C. M., Mallmann P., Römer T. Prognostic value of repeated serum CA 125 measurements in first trimester pregnancy. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2001; 97(2):168–173. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00533-9.
    2. Makinen J. I. Ectopic pregnancy in Finland 1967–83: a massive increase. British Medical Journal.1987;294(6574):740–741. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6574.740. 
    3. Coste J., Job-Spira N., Aublet-Cuvelier B., Germain E., Glowaczower E., Fernandez H., Pouly J. L. Incidence of ectopic pregnancy. First results of a population-based register in France. Human Reproduction.1994; 9(4):742–745.
    4. Department of Health. Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 1994–1996. London, UK: HMSO; 1998.
    5. Centers for Disease Control Ectopic pregnancy in the United States 1990–1992. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1995; 44(3):46–48.
    6. Predanic M. Differentiating tubal abortion from viable ectopic pregnancy with serum CA-125 and β-human chorionic gonadotropin determinations. Fertility and Sterility. 2000; 73(3):522–525. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00554-3. 
    7. Kuşçu E., Vicdan K., Turhan N. O., Oğuz S., Zorlu G., Gökmen O. The hormonal profile in ectopic pregnancies. Materia Medica Polona. 1993; 25(3-4):149–152. [PubMed]
    8. Uyar I., Yucel O. U., Gezer C., Gulhan I., Karis B., Hanhan H. M., Ozeren M. Effect of single-dose methotrexate on ovarian reserve in women with ectopic pregnancy. Fertility and Sterility. 2013; 100(5):1310–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.040.
    9. Igwegbe AO, Eleje GU, Ugboaja JO, Ofiaeli RO. Improving maternal mortality in Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria. Int J Gynaecol Obstet.2012; 116:197–200. 
    10. Udigwe GO, Umeononihu OS, Mbachu II. Ectopic Pregnancy: A 5-Year review of cases at Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital (NAUTH) Nnewi. Niger Med J.2010;51:160–3.
    11. Rose IA, Ayodeji, Olalekan OB, Sylvia A. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in Lagos, Niger. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005; 84:184–8. 
    12. Davor J. Ectopic pregnancy. In: Edmonds DK, editor. Dewhurst's Text Book of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 7th ed. Oxford, London: Blackwell Science; 2007. pp. 106–16.
    13. Sotubo O, Aboyeji AP. Ectopic pregnancy in Ilorin, Nigeria; A five year review. Niger Med Prac. 1994;27:25–7.
    14. Baffoe S, Nkyekyer K. Ectopic pregnancy in Korle Bu teaching hospital, Ghana: A three-year review. Trop Doct. 1999; 29:18–22. 
    15. Ola ER, Imosemi DO, Egwuatu JI, Abudu OO. Ectopic pregnancy in Lagos University, teaching hospital; experience over a five year period. Niger Qt Hosp Med. 1999; 9:100–3.
    16. Symonds IM. Ectopic pregnancy: Modern management of ectopic pregnancy. Curr Obstetr Gynecol. 1998; 8:27–31.
    17. Cates W, Rolfs RT, Aral SO. Sexually transmitted diseases, pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility: An epidemiology update. Epidemiol Rev. 1990; 12:199–220. 
    18. Rose IA, Ayodeji, Olalekan OB. Sylvia A. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in Lagos, Niger. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84:184-8.
    19. Akabr N, Shami N, Anwar S, Asif S. Evaluation of predisposing factors of tubal pregnancy in multigravidas versus primigravidas. J Surg PIMS 2002; 25:20-3)
    20. RDilbaz S, Katas B,Demir B, Dilbaz B. Treating cornual pregnancy with a single methotrexate injection: a report of 3 cases. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine [2005, 50(2):141-144] 
    21. VN Sivalingam, WC Duncan, E Kirk -Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2011;37:231-240 doi:10.1136/jfprhc-2011-0073
    22. Strohmer H, Obruca A, Lehner R, Egarter C, Husslein P, Felchtinger W. Successful treatment of a heterotopic pregnancy by sonographically guided instillation of hyperosmolar glucose. Fertil Steril. 1998; 69:149–51.
    23. Anandakumar C, Choolani MA, Adaikan PG, Wong YC, Gopal M, Marshall B, et al. Combined chemotherapy in the medical management of tubal pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;35:437–40.
    24. Corsan GH, Karacan M, Qasim S, Bohrer MK, Ransom MX, Kemmann E. Identification of hormonal parameters for successful systemic single-dose methotrexate therapy in ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2719–22
    25. Murphy AA, Nager CW, Wujek JJ, Kettel LM, Torp VA, Chin HG. Operative laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1992;57:1180–5.
    26. Vermesh M, Silva P, Rosen G, Stein AL, Fossum GT, Sauer MV. Management of unruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingostomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73:400–4.
    27. Lundorff P, Thorburn J, Hahlin M, Kallfelt B, Lindblom B. Laparoscopic surgery in ectopic pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparoscopy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991;70:343–8.
    28. Lundorff P, Thorburn J, Lindblom B. Fertility outcome after conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy evaluated in a randomized trial. Fertil Steril 1992; 57:998–1002.
    29. Gray D, Thorburn J, Lundorff P, Strandell A, Lindblom B. A cost-effectiveness study of a randomised trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 1995; 345:1139–43.
    30. Popat R, Adams C. Diagnosis of ruptured ectopic pregnancy by bedside ultrasonography. J Emerg Med 2002; 22:409–10.
    31. Li Z, Leng J, Lang J, Liu Z, Sun D, Zhu L. Laparoscopic surgery in patients with hypovolemic shock due to ectopic pregnancy. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2002; 37:653–5.
    32. Thornton K, Diamond M, DeCerney A. Linear salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1991; 18:95–109.
    33. Clausen I. Conservative versus radical surgery for tubal pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75:8–12.
    34. Mol BW, Hajenius PJ, Engelsbel S, Ankum WM, Hemrika DJ, van der Veen F, et al. Is conservative surgery for tubal pregnancy preferable to salpingectomy? An economic analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104:834–9.
    35. Parker J, Bisits A. Laparoscopic surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy: salpingectomy or salpingostomy? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 37:115–7.
    36. Tulandi T, Saleh A. Surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1999; 42:31–8.
    37. Yao M, Tulandi T. Current status of surgical and nonsurgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 421–33.
    38. Sowter M, Frappell J. The role of laparoscopy in the management of ectopic pregnancy. Rev Gynaecol Practice 2002; 2:73–82
    39-PISARSKA, MARGARETA D. MD; CARSON, SANDRA A. MD Incidence and Risk Factors for Ectopic Pregnancy Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology: March 1999 - Volume 42 - Issue 1 - pp. 2-8 
    40 Jean Bouyer1,  Joël Coste1,  Taraneh Shojaei1,  Jean-Luc Pouly2,  Nadine Job-Spira Risk Factors for Ectopic Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Analysis Based on a Large Case-Control, Population-based Study in France Oxford Journals Medicine & Health American Jnl of Epidemiology Volume 157, Issue 3 Pp. 185-194. )
    41. Hankins GD, Clark SL, Cunningham FG, Gilstrap LC. Ectopic pregnancy. In: Operative obstetrics. Norwalk, Conn.: Appleton & Lange, 1995:437–56.
    42. Ectopic pregnancy—United States, 1990–1992. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1995; 44:46–8.
    43. Phillips RS, Tuomala RE, Feldblum PJ, Schachter J, Rosenberg MJ, Aronson MD. The effect of cigarette smoking, Chlamydia trachomatis infection, and vaginal douching on ectopic pregnancy.Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 79:85–90.
    44. Abbott J, Emmans LS, Lowenstein SR. Ectopic pregnancy: ten common pitfalls in diagnosis. Am J Emerg Med. 1990; 8:515–22?
    45. Dorfman SF. Ectopic pregnancy surveillance. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1983; 32SS0119–21.
    46. Goldner TE, Lawson HW, Xia Z, Atrash HK. Surveillance for ectopic pregnancy—United States, 1970–1989. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1993; 42:73–85.
    47. Cates W, Rolfs RT, Aral SO. Sexually transmitted diseases, pelvic inflammatory disease, and infertility: an epidemiologic update. Epidemiol Rev. 1990; 12:199–220.
    48. Franks AL, Beral V, Cates W Jr, Hogue CJ. Contraception and ectopic pregnancy risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 1634 pt 11120–3. 
    49. Clausen I. Conservative versus radical surgery for tubal pregnancy. A review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996; 75:8–12.
    50. Pisarska MD, Carson SA, Buster JE. Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet. 1998; 351:1115–20. 
    51 A A Levin, S C Schoenbaum, P G Stubblefield, S Zimicki, R R Monson, and K J Ryan.  Ectopic pregnancy and prior induced abortion. American Journal of Public Health March 1982: Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 253-256)
    52. Saraiya M, Berg CJ, Kendrick JS, Strauss LT, Atrash HK, Ahn YW. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 178:493–8.
    53 Ke ndrick JS1, Tierney EF, Lawson HW, Strauss LT, Klein L, Atrash HKPrevious cesarean delivery and the risk of ectopic pregnancy.Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb; 87(2):297-301.
    54.  Barnhart K. T., Gosman G., Ashby R., Sammel M. The medical management of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis comparing “single dose” and “multidose“ regimens. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2003; 101(4):778–784. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)03158-7